The us government should be implementing stricter gun laws

Gun control has been an issue that has been vehemently battled on both sides of the argument, those supporting gun control and those supporting gun rights. Next my opponent goes on to argue proactive vs reactive.

Accidental Deaths, Suicides, and Crime, Prof. As it stands today, there are many gun control laws and regulations in place and those who are pro guns are constantly battling to have less of these laws in place, and further repeal any motion to implement new ones.

Guns arriving at buy-backs are simply not the same The us government should be implementing stricter gun laws that would otherwise have been used in crime. The right to bear arms is not absolute; it should be subject to regulation under certain requirements, such as when the commonwealth may be possibly threatened.

Two cities that have applied gun control in the United States at more strict levels than federal and state statutes are Los Angeles and Washington D. The forefathers of the United States included it in to law because of the experiences of tyranny and imperialism had on the Colonies, and the people were being abused and forbidden from their natural and civil rights.

First, many pro-gun advocates argue that an unarmed citizenry will be helpless against a tyrannical government. They claimed that laws and regulations would not bar children from acquiring guns if the education was not there in the first place.

The main argument presented by gun rights advocates is that the restriction of firearms is a violation of civil rights. Though gun control advocates seem to be unwavering on imposing further firearm laws and regulations, anti gun control factions such as the NRA have proven to become extremely influential and powerful political force to be reckoned with.

Only the government should have guns Fact: The right to own a firearm is not absolute; its exercise should be dependent upon the individual meeting several important conditions: Are you suggesting college students should carry fire arms?

Consider the fact that between andChicago police recovered 1, guns that were used in criminal activities. The fact is, measuring the impact is very difficult and complex given the architecture of gun law being implemented on varying degrees by different governmental levels. Examples of this are the western scenario my opponent offered or the lack of school shootings involving full auto machine guns.

One example of how difficult it is to build public support for stricter gun laws came last year in Nevada, where a ballot measure to expand gun background checks was approved -- but barelywinning The BATF once prosecuted gun collectors who sold as few as three guns per year at gun shows, claiming that they were unlicensed, and therefore illegal, gun dealers.

I on the other hand advocate prevention, my case stops the gun crimes before they ever happen by making the guns more and more difficult to come by. Forced to actually aim and 3. I partially agree with this statement however at the same time it still does make it harder to people to come across these guns.

Just as those in favor of gun control have their reasoning and logic behind their intent, anti gun control supporters also pose worthy arguments to oppose gun regulations and laws.

The fact that it is now illegal to carry guns like that has prevented many needless homicides. Regardless of their claims, it is important to realize that the effect on crime and murder that firearms may have are inconclusive. Gun control activists will often pose three concepts regarding the Second Amendment as it is written: Nobody needs fully automatic weapons or even weapons at all to protect themselves in the status quo.

My argument takes the guns off the street which lowers the chance of them falling into the hands, legally or illegally, of criminals. People who want guns can simply go outside of Chicago, obtain them with ease, and bring them back into the city. Anything but this would be superfluous and should be illegal under my arguments.

Americans want strict gun laws after mass shootings. Then their interest fades.

A quick glance over the list shows at least a few of them to be shootings. The interpretation of the Second Amendment is often found to be clashing among both gun control factions, and is one the most central and key arguments behind the controversy of the issue.

After all how many people are going to have weapons on them in a public area like a school? In order to do so, anti gun supporters must lobby at the various governmental levels--including federal, state, and local--in order to enact their philosophies and ideals regarding guns and firearms in to actual written law.

Gun control has become an aspect of the political world that is constantly changing according to how gun rights activists and gun control supporters argue and provide for sufficient reasoning for their cause.

Also reducing the number of guns makes the ones that exist easier to keep track of. If the gun is illegal it is harder to come by, especially for deranged children or college students. Gun laws are being enforced Fact: They really are great, the Army If we are all waiting for the terrorists to grab our children, shoot them, and shoot us, then what are we?

One of the arguments that is getting the most attention in recent times is gun violence and children or minors.

Access Denied

Though these restrictions may infringe on some slight level upon civil liberties, the cost will prove worth the price if guns are kept out of the hands of criminals. Anti gun control supporters stressed that it is the responsibility of the parents to educate their children about guns, and even go as far as teaching them how to appropriately handle firearms so as the can develop a personal sense of fear and respect for them, ant not regard them as toys.

While it is possible that tyranny may arise in our nation, this seems unlikely, given the existence of democratic institutions and a strong tradition of adherence to the rule of law. The registration of firearms will only affect criminals and it would aid law enforcement in keeping track of who owns and possesses firearms.Should we have stricter gun control?

Add a New Topic; I know we all want to shoot those big aks Ms and other assualt rifles But for the lives of people who live in the united states lets make criminals harder to get guns Yes, we should have stricter gun control.

Yes, we should have stricter gun control. Stricter gun laws would. In the wake of the massacre, the conservative federal government succeeded in implementing tough new gun control laws throughout the country.

A large array of weapons were banned—including the. However, the statistics of crime and the implementation of stricter gun laws do exist, and they exist supporting both sides of the gun control debate.

Certain numbers will indeed show how gun regulations and laws decrease crime rates, while other will show how the restrictions seem to lend for a rise in crime statistics. Study: Some Gun Control Laws Result in More Deaths acknowledging that illegal gun deaths could climb after implementing stricter gun-control laws.

"The projections are no longer going to be. Some say it's too easy for bad people to get a gun in the United States.

The U.S. government should impose stricter gun control laws in order to reduce violent crime

Others say it's too hard for law-abiding citizens to protect themselves. Should the U.S. implement stricter gun control laws? #WeNeedGunControl. #RightToBearArms. The government introduced a buyback program which dramatically reduced the number of guns in.

Should More Gun Control Laws Be Enacted in the United States? Read pros, cons, and expert responses in the debate. Should More Gun Control Laws Be Enacted in the United States?

Pro & Con Quotes; And it doesn't mean that we don't need stricter gun laws to keep them out of the hands of criminals and those with a complete disregard .

The us government should be implementing stricter gun laws
Rated 5/5 based on 92 review