The reasons why college athletes should be paid

Would the quality of the broadcasts or the coverage or the staging of the events be somehow diminished? The best football and basketball players in the Big Ten have produced to the degree that a television network has become the model for every conference in America, a network worth at least tens of millions of dollars to the member institutions.

How many people have gone abroad and bypassed playing college basketball before entering the NBA draft? They can sit out a season and lose some of their ability and educational aptitude, or they can go abroad. With a lack of other avenues for student athletes to go pursue, the NCAA has positioned itself as the be all, end all if you want to make it to the next level.

Cash or a salary could be spent on wants rather than necessities, potentially leading the athletes into a debt they would not have with the benefit of a scholarship. As an organization that started out to protect student athletes, how much good are they really doing?

Players currently have nothing to lose but a little playing time when they look to bend rules that keep them from The reasons why college athletes should be paid paid.

Players who watch their schools make fists full of dollars will get a small slice of pie. Because of strict NCAA rules, there are hundreds of student athletes that risk eligibility each semester just trying to make ends meet.

Nobody would feel sorry for players who get greedy and end up breaking the rules. Leave a comment and debate your position! They provide an education and everything that goes with it; all they ask for in return is your peak performance on the field.

Even though the numbers may not be quite the same, anything players can learn about money in college can go a long way towards saving more of it when they get to the pros. Any punishment only hurts the program and the players who are more dedicated to their craft. We fly football players across the country to play non-conference games and ask so much of their time away from the classroom.

Those who say college student-athletes should not be paid argue that they receive scholarships as a form of payment for their talents.

TheSportster.com

A good portion of these players are trying to adjust in the classroom as well and feel inferior in more ways than we care to realize. Sometimes the decision to leave school is purely economical as many players are lured to the potential money that can be made at the next level. Email Copy Link Copied By the start of the twentieth century, it was clear that college athletics needed regulation.

Most of the young people at major universities in the United States come from families that have incomes that are well above the national average. Despite the fact that they make no money because of their athletic prowess, these student athletes bring in millions of dollars annually, without ever receiving a dime.

If a car dealer wants to strike that deal then good for the player in question. So many parents would sacrifice for a few more years in order for their son to improve his draft stock or earn a degree.

While athletes have to stay in school for a minimum of two years before entering the NFL, more recently the NBA has implemented a similar rule of one year out of high school. If these athletes were paid, it would change their motives as students. College football and basketball alone bring in more money per year than the NHL and NBA, so why is it socially acceptable for them to be reading at a 5th grade reading level?

Instead, they go to the coaches, athletic directors, and some administrators, reports Edelman. Players would be less willing to risk a steady pay check to sign autographs or make money in some other illegal way. It is not their job to play sports; it is an extracurricular activity that is pursued while pursuing a higher education.

It might lead some players to stick around and work on a degree, their skills or maturity. If the NCAA provides such a high standard of education and services for free, then why are test scores so low?

As recently asin 40 out of 50 states the highest publically paid employee was the head basketball or football coach of a state university.Here are 11 legitimate reasons why student-athletes should be paid more.

NCAA players are considered amateurs despite helping earn more annually than some of America's major sports. Social Science. The best college athletes in the two revenue-producing sports have always been worth much more than tuition, room, board and books. The best football and basketball players in the Big Ten have produced to the degree that a television network has become the model for every conference in America, a network worth at least tens of millions of.

In closing, there are too many questions that need to be answered and too many issues that would arise from college athletes getting paid. A college athlete has a ton of privileges and opportunities.

There is no reason why they should be paid. Jan 30,  · This week, college football players at Northwestern University petitioned the National Labor Relations Board to form a union. The NCAA disagrees with the petition, arguing that student-athletes are not "employees" under federal law.

There are many reasons why NCAA athletes should be treated like traditional employees. Here are 21. Why student-athletes should be paid Being a college student-athlete is a full-time job, bouncing between the weight room, the court/field, classes, and film sessions.

College athletics are extracurricular activities, but the schedules of the National Collegiate Athletic Association’s (NCAA) tournaments require an extended period in which the student.

Should College Student-Athletes Be Paid? Both Sides of the Debate

7 Common Sense Reasons Why College Athletes Should Be Paid (According to Jay Bilas) I asked Mr. Bilas to explain in simple terms why college athletes deserve to be paid. This is what he told me.

Download
The reasons why college athletes should be paid
Rated 5/5 based on 72 review