Teachers have to choose between teaching well and teaching for the test. Chillingly, throughout all the arguments about statistics and scores, children are hardly mentioned; quite often, it seems that the children have been forgotten.
How teachers are limited to a specific teaching method. The No Child Left Behind plan attempts to address this issue.
They all share a common goal: Children in America are subjected to testing more than students in any other country in the world, yet their students are learning more than ours.
The most blatant forms of motivation, namely bribes and threats, are ultimately more harmful than helpful. Standardized testing has been utilized in the USA for so long, it seems forgotten that it is not necessary and that there are much better alternatives.
On the other hand, the exploitation of the system of standardized testing is linked to a number of issues.
Thus, educators who teach in poor areas are further pressured to provide a superficial education, covering only areas which are tested, so that the school will receive more funding. Since students attending schools located in poor areas tend to score lower, distributing funds thi way is the equivalent of deliberately denying financial aid to those schools that most need it.
Generally speaking, anything that shows what the student has been learning would be perfectly appropriate for her portfolio. Furthermore, since much of the student body in these schools consists of minorities, this unfair distribution policy is, essentially, discrimination.
The reasons for the concern on behalf of the federal government are astounding. It would be much harder to forget about the children who are being evaluated in a performance-based test, because it is much more personal and much less statistical.
This does not mean that these children are any more or less intelligent than others. Teachers are not given as much freedom as they would like, because they have to adapt to standardized testing measures and they are not given much discretion as to what the students are being taught.
We need teachers who have the courage to show students that intelligence is more than just memorizing state mandated facts and dates, because when classrooms are turned solely into test preparation boot camps, children lose what is most important in education.
It is unfair to those who are less fortunate and those who learned English as a second language to use such a flawed instrument to assess them, much less to categorize them. A person who gets a low test score may become discouraged from pursuing further academic success.
Statistics show that students from other countries consistently demonstrate a broader range of knowledge and a greater depth of understanding. When all is said and done, the fact remains that students who do not enjoy learning will not retain the facts that are forced upon them, effectively reducing their knowledge.
Also, due to the usage of these methods, the potential of human error is decreased, or even eliminated. China, Britain, United States. This idea may have the short-term desired effect. The SAT evaluates skills in vocabulary and mathematics, while the ACT has more to do with a broader range of knowledge and includes additional subjects, such as science.
Educators are harmed as well. One of the main purposes of testing is to set a standard: Students should be able to choose the specific field in which they want to pursue a career in while they are in their junior year of high school, in order to narrow down the application process when applying for college.
Most of these countries rarely use standardized tests before high school and even more rarely use multiple-choice tests for children of any age. If excellent teachers and principals decide to leave the profession as a result of incessant pressure to raise scores, we would expect minority and low-income students to be disproportionately affected by the departure of these educators.
Why it was originally administered? They are required to follow certain guidelines, in order to incorporate practice questions from standardized testing. These tests are measuring and rewarding superficial thinking more than active thinking.
But what really concerns me is how limited students are when it comes to creativity and critical thinking skills. The founder of the standardized testing system intended to create a uniform test to seek out the students who had the highest aptitude.Jan 11, · Argumentative Essay on Standardized Testing Standardized tests are exams designed to measure a student’s scholastic performance.
These tests are a controversial issue, because some people feel the test do not show the students’ intelligence. Sample Argumentative Essay Skills vs. Knowledge in Education These systems test this knowledge with standardized tests which compare students to each-other.
They only test the kind of information which is possible to measure in tests. The goal is gaining information, not. Argument Essay: Standardized Testing.
Topics: Standardized test, Standardized testing has taken an eminent role in deciphering today’s education and unfortunately, there is a test for every occasion whether it is for kindergarten, high school, college, or graduate school admission, or for the state to base a school’s progression.
The. Standardized tests have been used to allow higher education institutions to make a reliable decision on whether or not to accept certain students.
The testing system that was first created in has evolved and transformed to reflect modern day knowledge. Essay on Harmful Effects of Standardized Testing. Genevieve English July 5, Standardized Testing A Fault in School Systems Standardized testing had become a.
Standardized tests are assessments that are made by testing companies to tell what students in different school districts know. Standardized tests should be kept in schools.
One reason why standardized tests should be kept in schools is because they are a .Download